<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Latham and the ALP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/2005/09/20/marklatham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/2005/09/20/marklatham/</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Stephen Mok</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Mok</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/2005/09/20/marklatham/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Mok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/?p=10#comment-35</guid>
		<description>nash: Well constrution on the North-West Rail Link is meant to start in 2012 and be finished by 2017 (source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dipnr.nsw.gov.au/nwrl/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DIPNR&lt;/a&gt;)... do you reackon Labor will be electable again by then? ;)

Lisa: Thanks for you comment on my blog. I would&#039;ve left this comment at yours, but whatever I do I can&#039;t get past your captcha.

I think you&#039;re right, Latham&#039;s getting too much attention at the moment, but that will die down soon enough.

It&#039;s now clear that by taking such an extreme position (lashing out at everyone), all Latham has done is ensure his opinion is not going to be taken seriously. It might mean any constructive change he could have brought about within the ALP now may not occur. Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nash: Well constrution on the North-West Rail Link is meant to start in 2012 and be finished by 2017 (source: <a href="http://www.dipnr.nsw.gov.au/nwrl/" rel="nofollow">DIPNR</a>)&#8230; do you reackon Labor will be electable again by then? <img src='http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Lisa: Thanks for you comment on my blog. I would&#8217;ve left this comment at yours, but whatever I do I can&#8217;t get past your captcha.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right, Latham&#8217;s getting too much attention at the moment, but that will die down soon enough.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s now clear that by taking such an extreme position (lashing out at everyone), all Latham has done is ensure his opinion is not going to be taken seriously. It might mean any constructive change he could have brought about within the ALP now may not occur. Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nash</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/2005/09/20/marklatham/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/?p=10#comment-32</guid>
		<description>You know what I am Smok... the implosion of the ALP is not something i am particularly lamenting. 

Having said that, it is a sad state of affairs, I agree. There has been a serious failure of the opposition in this country and Latham is not helping. Party unity at the commonwealth level is obviously not as strong as it is on the state level, where they all seem to fold at the nearest sign of conflict.  At the moment it seems, that the chances of the ALP winning government are about as good as there being a train station at the end of franklin road :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I am Smok&#8230; the implosion of the ALP is not something i am particularly lamenting. </p>
<p>Having said that, it is a sad state of affairs, I agree. There has been a serious failure of the opposition in this country and Latham is not helping. Party unity at the commonwealth level is obviously not as strong as it is on the state level, where they all seem to fold at the nearest sign of conflict.  At the moment it seems, that the chances of the ALP winning government are about as good as there being a train station at the end of franklin road <img src='http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/2005/09/20/marklatham/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/?p=10#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I am saddened too - Denton was right on target. We (well I) once thought that Latham was a man who was talented, proactive and innovative. Right now he&#039;s just being reactive and by the sounds will be innactive in the future.

Another thing that&#039;s a bit sad is to see how much of a self-centred windbag Beazley is in &lt;a href=&quot;http://kim-beazley.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his diaries&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am saddened too &#8211; Denton was right on target. We (well I) once thought that Latham was a man who was talented, proactive and innovative. Right now he&#8217;s just being reactive and by the sounds will be innactive in the future.</p>
<p>Another thing that&#8217;s a bit sad is to see how much of a self-centred windbag Beazley is in <a href="http://kim-beazley.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">his diaries</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Mok</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/2005/09/20/marklatham/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Mok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenmok.net/blog/?p=10#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hah... just read something else. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/09/17/1126750155453.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this SMH article&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Mr Latham blames the alliance [with the US] for dragging Australia into unnecessary conflicts, including Vietnam and Iraq, and prefers the foreign policy model New Zealand has adopted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh how I&#039;d prefer Latham as PM, then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah&#8230; just read something else. According to <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/09/17/1126750155453.html" rel="nofollow">this SMH article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr Latham blames the alliance [with the US] for dragging Australia into unnecessary conflicts, including Vietnam and Iraq, and prefers the foreign policy model New Zealand has adopted.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh how I&#8217;d prefer Latham as PM, then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
